InformationWeek: Hyper-V Not For Enterprise

Posted on December 17, 2009 by Eric Gray

I enjoyed reading this InformationWeek article on 9 Reasons Enterprises Shouldn’t Switch To Hyper-V.

The author, Elias Khnaser, did an excellent job of articulating several of the key advantages that VMware vSphere has over Hyper-V — memory overcommit, hypervisor footprint, maturity, and more.

While you may already enjoy the numerous advantages of VMware ESX virtualization and purpose-built vCenter management, perhaps you have a colleague — or boss — who would benefit from reading the article.  Pass it on!

(Visited 98 times, 1 visits today)

Related posts:

  1. CIO deploys Hyper-V, loses job to 15-year-old
  2. Book Review: VCP4 Exam Cram [Giveaway!]
  3. Hey boss, where do you want these virtual machines?
  4. VMworld 2010 – TA8188: Competitive Platform Shootout
  5. Easy recovery from a full VMware ESX datastore
This entry was posted in Virtualizationism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to InformationWeek: Hyper-V Not For Enterprise

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention InformationWeek: Hyper-V Not For Enterprise | VCritical -- Topsy.com

  2. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  3. Eugene says:
    December 29, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    Not such good reporting I’m afraid… please read these posts:

    – http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=10240
    – http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2009/12/21/drilling-into-reasons-for-not-switching-to-hyper-v.aspx
    BTW: I still think ESX/VS is a better product than Hyper-V, but this kind of reporting reflects badly on VMware and only hurts the cause!

Comments are closed.